Brothers in Law is a recurring series by brothers Akhil and Vikram Amar, with special emphasis on measuring what the Supreme Court says against what the Constitution itself says. For more content from ...

This year marks the 128th year of the United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the landmark Supreme Court decision that established ...

Immigration Matters is a recurring series by César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández that analyzes the court’s immigration docket, ...

CONCORD, N.H. — Immigrants’ rights advocates today sued the Trump administration over its executive order that seeks to strip certain babies born in the United States of their U.S. citizenship. The ...

To be sure, Lynch is just one case, but it is an important one. The Supreme Court should appreciate that.

A Senate subcommittee hearing held March 10 on President Donald Trump's executive order to restrict access to birthright citizenship guaranteed in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution examined ...

President Donald Trump's bid to cut off birthright citizenship is a "flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage," ...

In this week's It’s Debatable article, Rick Rosen and Charles Moster debate President Trump's executive order denying citizenship to children born to mothers who are unlawfully in the United States.

The justices on April 1 will hear oral arguments in a landmark case in which the high court will decide whether it is constitutional for the president to block the children of immigrants without legal ...

President Donald Trump’s effort to rein in what he views as abuse of the 14th Amendment’s birthright citizenship provision ...

The participation of organizations with which we may strongly disagree does not automatically preclude ours if we are deeply committed to the cause.” — AJC spokesperson ...