News
Trying to get a nuclear reactor on the surface of the moon is going to take time – maybe much longer more than NASA wants.
Aviation Republic on MSN5h
40 Years, 1 Testbed Jet: Why NASA Kept Flying the F-104 Until 1994
NASA used the F-104 as a high-speed testbed for nearly 40 years. From Mach 2 chase planes to boundary-pushing research ...
As China and Russia race to stake their claim, America is bidding to get ahead through a fusion of federal funding and ...
Prof Goutam Chattopadhyay engaged in an exclusive conversation with The Statesman, highlighting his journey from Nabagram, a ...
A new NASA directive to accelerate development of a nuclear reactor for the moon has is aggressive but achievable, industry ...
At $37 trillion and counting, the national debt is in the stratosphere. That hasn’t stopped the space cadets in the federal ...
The Trump administration is pushing efforts to place a nuclear reactor on the moon to power a future human base. A newly ...
Nuclear reactors on the Moon and at Denver airport, Kentucky’s new uranium enrichment facility, and nuclear energy restarts are driving Trump’s goals.
When liquid water still existed on Mars, it carried dissolved minerals into rock cracks, NASA said. Once the liquid dried, it left the hardened minerals behind. The "unique shapes" left today were ...
According to a recent directive from acting administrator Sean Duffy, the space agency will launch a nuclear reactor to the moon by 2030.
NASA is accelerating its plans to establish a nuclear reactor on the Moon by the end of the decade to power lunar bases and gain an advantage in the new space race against Russia and China.
Facing a new space race with China and Russia, NASA is fast-tracking lunar nuclear power development and commercial space ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results